Sunday, 26 June 2011

Fat Burns In the "Flame of Lean Muscle Mass"

The Daily Lipid: When Fat Burns In the Flame of Lean Muscle Mass -- Better Put That Butter Either on Steak or Potatoes

In 1895, a biochemist by the name of Rosenfeld coined the expression "fat burns in the flame of carbohydrate." This was based on observations that cells could break down fatty acids into ketone bodies but without sufficient glucose the cells could not break them down fully into carbon dioxide and hydrogen.

The aphorism offered a simple explanation for why ketones are elevated to extreme levels in diabetes: diabetics do not use glucose efficiently, so glucose levels in the blood rise; since their cells are starved of glucose, the fat stores of these diabetics release their fatty acids and their livers break the fatty acids down into ketones, but these ketones cannot be used in the absence of glucose, so ketone levels in the blood rise and then the ketones are finally lost in the urine. Thus the diabetic is effectively in a constant state of starvation.

We now know that fat burns in the flame of oxaloacetate, which can be derived from either glucose or amino acids.

When we break down fats or carbohydrates for energy, we turn them into acetic acid, or acetate, which is a two-carbon unit. A little shuttle called coenzyme A, which is made of pantothenic acid, carries the acetate around and together we call the complex acetyl CoA. Pantothenate is also called vitamin B5 and is found abundantly in many foods but liver and egg yolks are among the highest (along with certain mushrooms, seeds, and yeast).

In order to fully harvest energy from acetate, we need to send it through the citric acid cycle, also called the Krebs cycle or the tricarboxylic acid (TCA cycle). This cycle will break the acetate down into carbon dioxide and hydrogen. In doing so, it will also release high-energy electrons whose energy can then be harvested to synthesize ATP, a major usable energy currency of the cell. Entry into this cycle is dependent on a compound called oxaloacetate.



In the presence of glucose, we convert glucose to oxaloacetate. Thus, as oxaloacetate leaves the Krebs cycle cuz it's got things to do and people to see, we can just use glucose to replenish it. In the absence of glucose, we do the opposite: we turn oxaloacetate into glucose. Thus, oxaloacetate gets depleted in the absence of glucose unless we have some other source of it. We can make oxaloacetate from a variety of amino acids, but not from fats. Thus, in the absence of dietary protein or carbohydrate, the only place to get oxaloacetate is to dig into the lean proteins found in our muscles and internal organs.

One thing I really like about The Perfect Health Diet is that although the authors advocate a low-carb diet, they devote a lot of attention to the body's need for glucose, rather than coming up with some silly aphorism like "there are essential amino acids and essential fatty acids, but there is no essential carbohydrate." The body may be able to survive without dietary glucose, but only because it can make glucose from protein. Give it only fat, and it will make that glucose — and oxaloacetate — from lean muscle tissue.

Better get a steak or potato to go with that butter!

Emily Deans, M.D. said...
Chris - I doubt you need to be burning predominantly ketones for the brain to see some benefit from ketosis. Zooko sent me links to so,e interesting studies on twitter - I think I will do a post on it, actually. They are familiar papers but the graphs are very interesting.
Chris Masterjohn said...
Emily, I don't doubt it, but the brain selectively gets the glucose when it is initially limiting, with muscles getting the ketones. Under more extensively glucose deprivation this shifts towards muscles using fatty acids and brains using ketones, which spares lean mass by reducing the need for gluconeogenesis. This is my understanding, at least, though I do need to look deeper at the primary literature on this and the differences between ketogenic diets and prolonged fasting. But my point in response to Dana was that even on a very low-carb diet with a moderate amount of protein, the brain, while perhaps using ketones to some degree, is probably still using primarily glucose. I'm very open to changing this view as I consider it tentative. I look forward to reading your post. Chris
Emily Deans, M.D. said...
I should say that a strict anti-seizure benefit would have to be from strict ketosis to up regulate the GABA reliably and consistently. But other conditions seem to benefit from dips into ketosis, or ketosis that just turns a ketostix. Well, post coming one of these days...
Chris Masterjohn said...
Hey Dr. Deans, In my experience, I can get ketostix purple just by exercising intensely and feasting on carbs. I'd be willing to bet that my brain was running almost entirely on glucose when my ketostix were as purple as they could get (granted I was eating plenty of fat including coconut fat during this time). I'm definitely not claiming dips into ketosis won't be of benefit -- I'm just saying (in my response to Dana, which I'm assuming that's what you're responding to) that in calculating the physiological glucose requirement of the brain you can't assume that a low-carb diet is going to substantially reduce it. Most low-carb diets probably keep the brain running mostly on glucose is my guess, and that's all I was saying. Chris

Paul Jaminet said...
Hi Chris, Great post, and thanks for the shout-out! Here are a few thoughts I had while reading: The “fat burns in the flame of oxaloacetate” discussion is an elegant summary of why 95% fat diets are unhealthy. Re Dana’s point, the body consumes a lot of glucose whether it is consumed or no. If you want to exclude carbs from the diet, you’d better eat sufficient protein! Even if you do, it’s far from clear that manufacture from protein is the optimal way to meet glucose needs. I don’t believe it is. Re ketogenic diets, I’ve migrated to the view that the optimal ketogenic diet even for clinical use should have minimal excess ketones, few excreted ketones, and a fair amount of dietary carbs and protein. Once ketones are being excreted, few tissues are taking up marginal ketones. I think the clinical ketogenic diets often overshoot the optimal amount of ketones, and undershoot the optimal amount of carbs and protein. Re Ned’s point, I’ve eaten a moderately ketogenic low-protein diet for a long time and my albumin levels have never budged. Of course I’ve never eaten a 95% fat diet … but I would imagine you would lose a lot of lean muscle mass before serum albumin levels would start to decrease. Anyway, great thought-provoking post! Best, Paul

John said...
Another great post Chris. The way I see it is that fat can burn in the flame of anything that keeps the TCA cycle going. Even though oxaloacetate is drawn off, you can replenish it via every intermediate in the TCA cycle, because it will eventually be turned into oxaloacetate anyway. Glucose and amino acids are just two of the TCA cycle replenishing options. Another option would be odd-chain fatty acids. They can burn (somewhat) in their own flame, because the last cycle of their β-oxidation will provide propionyl-CoA, which can be turned into succinyl-CoA, a TCA cycle intermediate (not shown in the TCA cycle diagram BTW). And what about the substance that gave the cycle its name: citric acid. Perhaps that's the reasoning behind the lemon diet: burn fat in the flame of citric acid. The citric acid (and some sugar) from the lemons should be able to keep the TCA cycle going, so that would spare protein. But when you know all this, why go for the sour taste of a lemon diet? Using a sugar drink should do the trick just as well. Hmmmm, burning fat with a sugar drink? That sounds a lot like the Shangri-La diet by Seth Roberts. John

Thursday, 16 June 2011

Catecholamines - fixing low carb damage

Matt Stone explains what happens aft the end of the low carb honeymoon period, and proposes carb cycling as the solution: 180 Degree Health: The Catecholamine Honeymoon.

nb: Wikepedia on Catecholamines - here

Key point:
A quick summary of those that have the best results reveals a theme emerging almost immediately – losing body fat must be done by raising the catecholamines. However, to keep your body from adapting to the surge in catecholamines, you MUST NOT be in weight loss mode 7 days per week. That’s why it’s the half-time dieters that manage to lose fat without (as much) negative consequence.
Extracts:
RRARF, a protocol I’ve laid out in the FREE eBOOK that you can access HERE to counter each one of those high adrenal dead ends, is the perfect antithesis to each one of those paths. As the most astute health and nutrition researchers understand, such as Lyle McDonald, overfeeding, especially when it is high in carbohydrates and paired with lots of sleep and physical inactivity, lowers catecholamine levels as well as cortisol levels – another adrenal hormone that works against someone looking to improve their health, vitality, and body composition.

By dropping the levels of all these adrenal hormones, you allow your adrenal glands to heal themselves, and you allow the adrenergic receptors to upregulate as well, making those adrenal hormones much more effective the next time you go to use them


Plus, you get to optimize the output of your thyroid and sex hormones which is another major advantage. Lastly, overfeeding is a hell of a way to increase lean body mass, particularly once you’ve continued it for a substantial amount of time. In fact, several people have reported seeing continual rises in weight with pants fitting more loosely as time goes by – indicative of the bodybuilder Holy Grail state of positive calorie balance and negative fat balance simultaneously (losing fat while eating more calories than you are burning).

But RRARF, and overfeeding in general, is a rehabilitative strategy. 

Like I’ve said since the beginning, there are no health awards awaiting those who manage to eat the most food and exert the least amount of physical energy in their lifetimes. Rather, it’s taking a timeout to heal up before you try to move forward – especially when it comes to making attempts to improve your body composition.

Having said that, there will a considerable amount of focus coming up this summer on body composition, and how the effective strategies used for losing body fat (low-carb, IF, exercise, etc.) can be used in a way that potentially avoids the pitfalls or the dead ends of just simply “going on a low-carb diet” or “exercising a bunch.”


A quick summary of those that have the best results reveals a theme emerging almost immediately – losing body fat must be done by raising the catecholamines. However, to keep your body from adapting to the surge in catecholamines,
you MUST NOT be in weight loss mode 7 days per week. That’s why it’s the half-time dieters that manage to lose fat without (as much) negative consequence. Part-time dieters can be filed into four basic categories…
1) Carb Cyclers
2) Re-Feeders
3) Intermittent Fasters
4) Exercisers

With
carb cycling, you lose fat with a big rise in catecholamines while low in carbohydrates – then you eat tons of carbohydrates periodically throughout the week (once every 3 days for example, or once every 3 meals in the case of Jay Robb). This prevents adaptation somewhat, and allows you to get away with more fat loss than you would otherwise be able to get away with – and less rebound. You can also gain muscle on your high carbohydrate days and make some big changes to your appearance.

Re-feeders
are basically cycling calories. They may spend 5 days losing weight, and 2 days gaining weight each week. By timing your overfeeding days with a good weightlifting session and extra carbohydrates, you can ensure that more of your excess calories end up in muscle tissue than fat. By keeping carbohydrates somewhat low while doing long-duration, low-intensity exercise during the underfeeding days, you can lose more fat than muscle while underfeeding. Thus, each week you can literally gain muscle and lose fat, and do so with minimal adaptation on behalf of your body.

Intermittent fasters
are losing fat very rapidly while blunting appetite during the fasting period. Once again, this is due to big rises in catecholamines primarily. However, you’d destroy yourself in a hurry if you overdid this – and the fat loss/high catecholamine period is met with big meals and some good rest – usually following a workout in which you are burning maximal amounts of fat (towards the end of a 16-24 hour fasting period).

Then there are the
exercisers, who raise catecholamines and burn fat during exercise, and lower catecholamines and replace fat after exercise. Those who do the most exercise and rest the least, lose fat the fastest but do the most damage and cause the most metabolic adaptation. Once again, you need both fat burning/high catecholamine spurts followed with rest and rehabilitation for it to work long time without working you over.

And of course the best approach is one that combines elements of all of those approaches in a very shrewd and sustainable manner with great caution and a great understanding of both anabolism (low-catecholamine states more or less) and catabolism (high-catecholamine states more or less).


The best out there currently appears to be Martin Berkhan of
http://www.leangains.blogspot.com/

Martin does just a small amount of exercise (a few hours per week), which he times with big periods of overfeeding, including lots of carbohydrates, for maximal muscle growth following the workouts (carbohydrates, when paired with protein, provide better protein deposition into muscle cells). He has even been known to eat entire Cheesecakes at one sitting – not something you’d picture being a habit of someone with 5% bodyfat, but, done intelligently with the right timing, may actually be effective for fat loss and improving body composition.
The rest of the week, he eats a more low-carbohydrate, high-protein diet (but not ketogenic, which is important) while going long periods (16 hours) without food each day. He calls this Intermittent Fasting, but it’s not truly intermittent fasting. I would call it “decreased meal frequency,” and I suspect it would be just as effective to eat 3 meals per day spaced 6-7 hours apart (the first 3-4 hours after meals are a low-catecholamine period… after that you are burning fat – so the longer you go between meals and snacks the more fat you will be burning) as it would be to skip breakfast to increase the fasting period. It would certainly achieve some of the effects, and would be a little easier on the adrenals for those that really have issues there – which includes a great many people who have flocked to 180D no doubt.
Anyway, some food for thought for those who feel they have really rehabilitated themselves from some of their dietary and heredity follies, and are inspired to pursue a little risky narcissism.
I personally will be doing a very high volume of exercise over the summer because I love hiking (... and fishing - and I have to walk a long way to find fish as big as the one in the photo below dumb enough to go after what I throw at them), but high volume exercise like that (15-20 hours per week most weeks) is too much to attempt carbohydrate restriction or intermittent fasting with the delicate adrenals I’ve been dealt combined with the damage I’ve inflicted upon them thus far in my life.
But you can bet I’ll be having some good rest days with big calorie surpluses and unfathomable amounts of carbohydrates. This will both prevent negative consequence and improve performance out on the ol’ trail. (Note, on low-carb my hiking performance was the worst, the aftermath was the worst, but my body composition was by far the best… impressive body composition doesn’t necessarily = health).
More to come in the months ahead as I continue to review the works of:
  • Lyle McDonald
  • Scott Abel
  • Rob Faigan
  • Brad Pilon
  • Jay Robb
  • Martin Berkhan
  • Clarence Bass
  • Joel Marion
  • Dan Duchaine
  • Anthony Colpo
… and a handful of others who are implementing some of these “smart” approaches to fat loss without the standard pitfalls – the greatest of which is the high-cortisol and/or downregulated adrenergic receptor rude awakening.
But please don’t get overly-seduced by any of these authors or the programs they recommend. As you’ll see in the comments section of this post I’m willing to bet, there are people who had both great and catastrophic results on each and every one of the strategies discussed above.